Enhancing Search for Seamless Discovery for 350M+ SonyLIV Users

Enhancing Search for Seamless Discovery for 350M+ SonyLIV Users

SonyLIV serves 350M+ users, and search is the gateway to discovering Originals, Live Sports, Movies, and TV Shows. But the legacy search experience created friction, people struggled to find relevant results, refine queries, and navigate a massive library.

SonyLIV serves 350M+ users, and search is the gateway to discovering Originals, Live Sports, Movies, and TV Shows. But the legacy search experience created friction, people struggled to find relevant results, refine queries, and navigate a massive library.

Redesigned SonyLIV Search to be faster, clearer, and more intelligent—scaling across Android, iOS, tablets, and low-end devices

Redesigned SonyLIV Search to be faster, clearer, and more intelligent—scaling across Android, iOS, tablets, and low-end devices

Role: Product Designer (End-to-end)

Role: Product Designer (End-to-end)

Role: Product Designer (End-to-end)

Platform: Fintech & AI, B2B SAAS

Platform: Fintech & AI, B2B SAAS

Platform: Fintech & AI, B2B SAAS

Team: 1 Designer, 1 PM, 1 PO, 3 Engineers

Team: 1 Designer, 1 PM, 1 PO, 3 Engineers

Team: 1 Designer, 1 PM, 1 PO, 3 Engineers

TL;DR

TL;DR

TL;DR

Problem

Problem

Legacy search made it hard to surface relevant results, refine queries, and navigate content at scale.

Legacy search made it hard to surface relevant results, refine queries, and navigate content at scale.

What I did

What I did

Redesigned the experience using failure patterns, user complaints, and global benchmarking—then validated changes through prototypes and quick feedback loops.

Redesigned the experience using failure patterns, user complaints, and global benchmarking—then validated changes through prototypes and quick feedback loops.

Impact

Impact

Improved search-to-play conversion, reduced time-to-result friction, increased search success rate, boosted retention during sports events, and improved performance for low-end devices.

Improved search-to-play conversion, reduced time-to-result friction, increased search success rate, boosted retention during sports events, and improved performance for low-end devices.

Context (Set the stakes)

Context (Set the stakes)

Context

Search is a high-intent moment. People use it when they already know what they want, or when they want the fastest path to something worth watching. When search fails, users don’t browse longer they leave.

Search is a high-intent moment. People use it when they already know what they want, or when they want the fastest path to something worth watching. When search fails, users don’t browse longer they leave.

The Problem

The Problem

The Problem

The legacy experience broke in predictable ways:

  • Relevance wasn’t consistent

  • Refinement was hard

  • Results were difficult to scan

  • Performance issues hurt low-end devices globally

The legacy experience broke in predictable ways:

  • Relevance wasn’t consistent

  • Refinement was hard

  • Results were difficult to scan

  • Performance issues hurt low-end devices globally


Before: search made users work too hard to get to a playable result.”

Before: search made users work too hard to get to a playable result.”

Goals & Success Metrics

Goals & Success Metrics

Goals & Success Metrics

Goals

Goals

  • Make search faster and clearer

  • Improve relevance and discoverability.

  • Support refinement (filters/categories) without overwhelming users

  • Make the experience reliable across devices and network quality

  • Make search faster and clearer

  • Improve relevance and discoverability.

  • Support refinement (filters/categories) without overwhelming users

  • Make the experience reliable across devices and network quality

Success metrics (what we aimed to move)

Success metrics (what we aimed to move)

  • Search-to-play conversion

  • Time-to-result friction

  • Search success rate (typed + suggested)

  • Retention during high-traffic sports events

  • Performance on low-end devices / low bandwidth

  • Search-to-play conversion

  • Time-to-result friction

  • Search success rate (typed + suggested)

  • Retention during high-traffic sports events

  • Performance on low-end devices / low bandwidth

What I owned + collaboration

What I owned + collaboration

What I owned + collaboration

I led end-to-end Search UX/UI including: UX principles, competitive research, IA & categorization, insight mapping, interaction/UI design, responsive adaptation, usability testing, and handoff specs.

I led end-to-end Search UX/UI including: UX principles, competitive research, IA & categorization, insight mapping, interaction/UI design, responsive adaptation, usability testing, and handoff specs.

What's been learned (Discovery → Insights)

What's been learned (Discovery → Insights)

What's been learned (Discovery → Insights)

My process started with why search was breaking, before designing how it should work:

My process started with why search was breaking, before designing how it should work:

  1. Identified drop-offs and failure patterns

  2. Extracted recurring complaints from reviews and user interviews

  3. Benchmarked global patterns (Netflix, Amazon Prime, YouTube)

  4. Clustered issues into accuracy, discoverability, relevance, refinement

  5. Used these clusters to guide UI decisions

  6. Prototyped and validated through quick feedback loops

  1. Identified drop-offs and failure patterns

  2. Extracted recurring complaints from reviews and user interviews

  3. Benchmarked global patterns (Netflix, Amazon Prime, YouTube)

  4. Clustered issues into accuracy, discoverability, relevance, refinement

  5. Used these clusters to guide UI decisions

  6. Prototyped and validated through quick feedback loops

The 4 insight themes

The 4 insight themes

  1. Relevance breaks trust — if the first screen feels wrong, users give up.

  2. Discoverability needs structure — users need helpful suggestions and clear categories.

  3. Refinement must be effortless — filters and sorting should reduce effort, not add it.

  4. Performance is part of UX — search must feel quick, especially during sports spikes and on low-end devices.

  1. Relevance breaks trust — if the first screen feels wrong, users give up.

  2. Discoverability needs structure — users need helpful suggestions and clear categories.

  3. Refinement must be effortless — filters and sorting should reduce effort, not add it.

  4. Performance is part of UX — search must feel quick, especially during sports spikes and on low-end devices.

Key Decisions

Key Decisions

Key Decisions

Decision 1: Make “first results” scannable and structured

Decision 1: Make “first results” scannable and structured

Why

Why

Users decide in seconds whether search is “working.”

Users decide in seconds whether search is “working.”

What changed

What changed

Clear result layout + metadata that supports fast selection.

Clear result layout + metadata that supports fast selection.

Decision 2: Reduce typing effort with dynamic suggestions

Decision 2: Reduce typing effort with dynamic suggestions

Why

Why

Faster input increases success on the first try.

Faster input increases success on the first try.

What changed

What changed

Smart suggestions that guide users while typing.

Smart suggestions that guide users while typing.

Decision 3: Make refinement obvious (filters + categories)

Decision 3: Make refinement obvious (filters + categories)

Why

Why

Libraries are massive—users need control without friction.

Libraries are massive—users need control without friction.

What changed

What changed

Cleaner categorisation + better filters to narrow quickly.

Cleaner categorisation + better filters to narrow quickly.

Decision 4: Optimize for low-end devices and low bandwidth

Decision 4: Optimize for low-end devices and low bandwidth

Why

Why

Performance directly affects search completion and retention.

Performance directly affects search completion and retention.

What changed

What changed

Responsive layouts + performance-first design decisions across devices.

Responsive layouts + performance-first design decisions across devices.

Solution Walkthrough

Solution Walkthrough

Solution Walkthrough

Impact

Impact

Impact

  1. Improved search-to-play conversion (better relevance + scannability)

  2. Reduced time-to-result friction (suggestions + clearer refinement)

  3. Increased search success rate for typed + suggested queries

  4. Boosted retention during sports events (real-time sports visibility)

  5. Enhanced experience for low-end devices / low bandwidth (performance-first UI)

  1. Improved search-to-play conversion (better relevance + scannability)

  2. Reduced time-to-result friction (suggestions + clearer refinement)

  3. Increased search success rate for typed + suggested queries

  4. Boosted retention during sports events (real-time sports visibility)

  5. Enhanced experience for low-end devices / low bandwidth (performance-first UI)

Outcome

Outcome

Outcome

Use your existing outcome sections as the closing story:

Use your existing outcome sections as the closing story:

  1. Improved search efficiency (fewer refine loops, less typing)

  2. Higher search-to-play conversions (structured layouts + ranking)

  3. Increased user satisfaction (reviews + clarity + filters)

  4. Stronger retention during peak events (handled spikes smoothly)

  5. Optimised for all devices (responsive + reduced lag)

  1. Improved search efficiency (fewer refine loops, less typing)

  2. Higher search-to-play conversions (structured layouts + ranking)

  3. Increased user satisfaction (reviews + clarity + filters)

  4. Stronger retention during peak events (handled spikes smoothly)

  5. Optimised for all devices (responsive + reduced lag)

Learnings + Next Steps

Learnings + Next Steps

Learnings + Next Steps

Learnings

Learnings

  • Search UX is about reducing uncertainty fast.

  • Performance isn’t a technical detail, it’s the product.

  • Search UX is about reducing uncertainty fast.

  • Performance isn’t a technical detail, it’s the product.

Next steps

Next steps

  • Personalised suggestions (based on viewing intent)

  • Better query understanding (spelling variants, multilingual)

  • Instrumentation by intent type (known-title vs browse-intent)

  • Personalised suggestions (based on viewing intent)

  • Better query understanding (spelling variants, multilingual)

  • Instrumentation by intent type (known-title vs browse-intent)